TypeSafe AI for M&E Data Quality Triage
How to Use TypeSafe AI for M&E Data Quality Triage
A practical beginner’s tutorial for checking indicator records and identifying cases that need human review.
1. What Is Data Quality Triage?
Imagine that an M&E team receives thousands of indicator records every month.
Each record might contain:
- Indicator name
- Reported value
- Target
- Reporting period
- Data source
- Supporting evidence
- Comments
Before these records are used in dashboards, donor reports, or management decisions, they may need a data-quality check.
Triage simply means sorting records according to what needs attention.
For example:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PASS | No initial data-quality concern identified. |
| REVIEW | An M&E professional should investigate. |
| FAIL | A defined data-quality requirement was not met. |
Important: PASS does not mean that the reported number is proven to be correct. It means that the record passed the checks you defined.
2. The Example We Will Build
We will use this fictional indicator:
| Indicator | Number of women completing vocational training |
| Reported value | 247 |
| Target | 250 |
| Reporting period | January–March 2026 |
| Data source | Training attendance register |
| Evidence | Signed attendance register uploaded |
| Comments | Three training sessions were completed. |
3. First Build Your Data-Quality Rules
Do this before using AI.
Decide what you want to check.
For our example, we will use four questions:
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Completeness | Are the required fields present? |
| Evidence | Is appropriate supporting evidence available? |
| Evidence strength | How strong is the supporting evidence? |
| Overall status | Should the record PASS, be REVIEWED, or FAIL? |
These are illustrative rules. Your organization should use its own approved data-quality framework.
4. Understand the Three Simple AI Decisions
TypeSafe’s workflow methodology uses narrow decisions rather than asking an AI model to solve the entire problem in one large prompt. Its published examples use three basic types: Yes/No, Choice, and Score.
For this beginner exercise, we only need the first two.
Yes/No → one of two answers.
Choice → choose one answer from a defined list.
For example:
Yes/No: Is supporting evidence available?
Choice: What is the evidence strength — Strong, Moderate, Weak, or None?
5. Open TypeSafe
Open the TypeSafe Console:
TypeSafe’s current agreement identifies the web interface at this address and also provides an API for programmatic use.
6. Create Decision #1 — Completeness
We want to know whether the record contains the information we need.
Create a Yes/No decision with this question:
Are all required fields present in this indicator record?
Provide the indicator record as the information the AI should examine.
Our example contains all the fields, so our human reference answer is:
Run the decision and record what TypeSafe actually returns.
7. Create Decision #2 — Supporting Evidence
Now create another Yes/No decision.
Is appropriate supporting evidence available for the reported value?
Our fictional record contains a signed attendance register.
Assuming that this is an appropriate source for this indicator, our reference answer is:
Again, compare this with the actual TypeSafe result.
8. Create Decision #3 — Evidence Strength
Now we need a slightly more detailed judgment.
Create a Choice decision:
How strong is the supporting evidence for this reported value?
Use four choices:
- Strong — direct and appropriate evidence is available.
- Moderate — evidence exists but additional checking may be useful.
- Weak — evidence is incomplete or unclear.
- None — no supporting evidence is available.
For our fictional record, the reference answer could be Strong, assuming the signed attendance register is the appropriate source.
9. Create Decision #4 — Overall Status
Now create the final Choice decision.
Based on the indicator record and the available evidence, what should happen next?
Choices:
PASS | REVIEW | FAIL
This is where your organization’s actual data-quality rules become important.
For example, you might define:
REVIEW: information is incomplete, ambiguous, or requires additional verification.
FAIL: a mandatory requirement is clearly not met.
These rules are examples, not universal M&E standards.
10. Create Decision #5 — Human Review
Finally, create a Yes/No decision:
Does this record require review by an M&E professional?
Possible answers:
YES or NO.
11. Your First Workflow Is Ready
You now have a simple workflow:
↓
Completeness check
↓
Evidence check
↓
Evidence strength
↓
Overall status
↓
PASS / REVIEW / FAIL
TypeSafe’s published workflow examples use this same general principle: break a larger task into smaller intelligent judgments and combine their results with ordinary programmatic rules.
12. Now Test a Problematic Record
This is where the tutorial becomes more interesting.
Change only the evidence field:
Run the same decisions again.
You would expect the workflow to identify a problem with the evidence.
A possible human reference outcome might be:
| Decision | Reference |
|---|---|
| Required fields present | YES |
| Evidence available | NO |
| Evidence strength | None |
| Overall status | REVIEW* |
| Human review | YES |
*The final status depends on your organization’s approved rules.
13. Use Rules Where AI Is Not Necessary
This is one of the most important lessons in the tutorial.
Suppose your organization’s policy says:
That is a normal software rule:
You do not need AI to make that decision.
AI is more useful for questions that require interpretation, such as:
This combination of AI judgment + ordinary software rules is central to TypeSafe’s published workflow approach.
14. Record Your Results in Excel or Google Sheets
Create a simple validation sheet with these columns:
| Column | What to record |
|---|---|
| A | Record ID |
| B | Human status |
| C | AI status |
| D | AI confidence |
| E | Human/AI agreement |
| F | Human review required |
| G | Reason for disagreement |
This spreadsheet is your validation record.
15. Test More Than One Example
Do not stop after one successful test.
Try cases such as:
- complete record + strong evidence;
- missing evidence;
- weak evidence;
- conflicting evidence;
- missing reporting period;
- unclear data source;
- reported value that looks unusual;
- contradictory comments.
The difficult cases are often more useful than the easy ones.
16. Compare AI With Human Decisions
Suppose you test 100 records.
Your validation table might eventually show:
| Human | AI | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| PASS | PASS | Record agreement |
| REVIEW | PASS | Investigate disagreement |
| FAIL | REVIEW | Investigate disagreement |
Do not simply calculate an overall percentage and stop.
Look at why the AI and human reviewer disagree.
17. What Does Confidence Mean?
TypeSafe says Jev provides probabilities and confidence with its structured decisions.
For a beginner, think of confidence as information about how strongly the model supports its decision.
But there is an important warning:
You need to test whether higher confidence actually corresponds to higher accuracy on your M&E data.
18. Build a Human Review Queue
After validation, the workflow can eventually be used to sort larger numbers of records.
↓
AI-assisted triage
↓
PASS | REVIEW | FAIL
↓
Human review queue
The goal is not to remove M&E professionals from the process.
The goal is to help them focus their time on records that need attention.
19. Start Small Before Going to Production
Use this progression:
1 record → 10 records → 50 records → 100+ validation records → larger dataset
At every stage, check performance and investigate important errors.
20. Do Not Start With Sensitive Data
For your first TypeSafe experiment, use fictional, public, or properly anonymized data.
Before sending real evaluation data to an external AI service, check:
- your organization’s privacy requirements;
- participant consent arrangements;
- contractual requirements;
- applicable data-protection law; and
- the provider’s current terms and data-processing documentation.
TypeSafe currently provides both a hosted web interface and API, and its legal documentation should be reviewed before operational use with sensitive data.
21. The Complete Workflow
↓
Break criteria into small decisions
↓
Build Yes/No and Choice questions
↓
Test with sample records
↓
Compare with human review
↓
Investigate disagreements
↓
Define human-review rules
↓
Validate
↓
Scale
22. Beginner Checklist
☐ I defined what good-quality data means.
☐ I created my data-quality questions.
☐ I separated AI judgments from fixed rules.
☐ I created a Yes/No decision.
☐ I created a Choice decision.
☐ I tested individual records.
☐ I tested difficult cases.
☐ I compared AI results with human decisions.
☐ I investigated disagreements.
☐ I validated the workflow before using production data.
23. The Main Lesson
Don’t ask AI whether your data is “good.”
Define what good data means first, then use AI to assist with the judgments that require interpretation.
The practical formula is:
Official Resources
Introducing System One Models & Jev
